But when it comes right down to it, we are all playing on the same table now with the exception of Audio interfaces and outboard gear. With the computer age, there is only mere cloning or mimicking if you will of that classic gear (which they do a mighty fine job if I say so myself). But I have to be honest with myself, im not sure there is a great big difference and if I were to blind test them I can not say I would be able to tell (except for the Analog feature on the Waves SSL, I better be able to hear that or everything I've been believing about Analog is a lie ) We have all been around the block and lived through the hardware age where each different piece of gear had its own unique characteristics. because when I listen closely to the Waves SSL bus compressor, I honestly do feel like I hear a difference from the others. EDIT: I wanted to add a bit more to my previous comment- I really wanted to disagree with you on this Bitflipper. Sure there will always be new features added but until a new fidelity is invented the only thing really becoming more creative are GUI's. I believe we are coming to a rock bottom in world of Digital recording and there's not much room to expand (sonically speaking). Its a great question really because when you think about it, It all about the code. But for some reason, popular opinion generally prefers The Glue in polls. While official SSL emulations and The Glue each have features the other lacks, they both cover the same basic territory. You are right about the GUIs, it's like a flashback to my stereo separates in the seventies, in a good way.Īll in all, I don't use them frequently, but am glad they are there when I do.īitflipper schwa My question is: If you like to use S-type tools in your channels, do you prefer Waves, Prochannel, or something else? If so, why? My question is: can anyone really tell the difference in a blind listening test? I can't distinguish, for example, between the ProChannel compressor and Cytomic The Glue without peeking. Occasionally I use the reverb, but not often. Of the three EQs, it is usually the Focussing EQ that gets used. The FET compressor can often work well if I am not getting what I want from the PC76, which isn't often. They tend to come into play when I am struggling to get the right sound with my "go to" plugs.
😊 I find I use them less frequently now. You can tell which projects I did around the time I purchased it, as they are littered with the Softube stuff. I picked it up on sale, so it's worth looking out for. The read some postive comments about the focusing equailzer, that made it appealto me in particular, the TSAR has been praised as well I'm kind of glad they have iLok, because I can't justify the 300 dollars for them at the mo, other things have to come first.
0 kommentar(er)
